news
A round-up of today’s LNG reports:
“LNG gives the U.S. geopolitical leverage, and new terminals are an economic driver in some places.”
The red hot politics of super-chilled LNG
The future of liquefied natural gas exports is fast becoming the biggest energy policy battle of 2024 — and maybe beyond.
“There is mounting evidence that LNG is more greenhouse gas-intensive than previously estimated, and it could even be worse for the climate than coal. But crucially, U.S. LNG has no or very limited impact on coal consumption overseas. Instead, U.S. LNG is likely competing with investments in the clean energy economy the world needs to protect us from even graver climate impacts.”
Liquefied Natural Gas has Limited Impact in Displacing Coal Emissions
The fossil fuel industry is selling a false narrative that liquefied natural gas (LNG) expansion is a “climate solution” because it displaces coal consumption globally. This claim doesn’t stand up against the facts. U.S. LNG has no or very limited…
Relevant, an earlier consideration:
